Effects of phase synchronization and frequency specificity in the encoding of conditioned fear–a web-based fear conditioning study

Bitte benutzen Sie diese Kennung, um auf die Ressource zu verweisen:
https://doi.org/10.48693/484
Open Access logo originally created by the Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Langanzeige der Metadaten
DC ElementWertSprache
dc.creatorPlog, Elena-
dc.creatorAntov, Martin I.-
dc.creatorBierwirth, Philipp-
dc.creatorStockhorst, Ursula-
dc.date.accessioned2024-02-12T15:07:54Z-
dc.date.available2024-02-12T15:07:54Z-
dc.date.issued2023-03-03-
dc.identifier.citationPlog E., Antov M.I., Bierwirth P., Stockhorst U. (2023): Effects of phase synchronization and frequency specificity in the encoding of conditioned fear–a web-based fear conditioning study. PLOS ONE 18(3): e0281644.ger
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.48693/484-
dc.identifier.urihttps://osnadocs.ub.uni-osnabrueck.de/handle/ds-2024021210597-
dc.description.abstractOscillatory synchronization in the theta-frequency band was found to play a causal role in binding information of different modalities in declarative memory. Moreover, there is first evidence from a laboratory study that theta-synchronized (vs. asynchronized) multimodal input in a classical fear conditioning paradigm resulted in better discrimination of a threat-associated stimulus when compared to perceptually similar stimuli never associated with the aversive unconditioned stimulus (US). Effects manifested in affective ratings and ratings of contingency knowledge. However, theta-specificity was not addressed so far. Thus, in the present pre-registered web-based fear conditioning study, we compared synchronized (vs. asynchronized) input in a theta-frequency band vs. the same synchronization manipulation in a delta frequency. Based on our previous laboratory design, five visual gratings of different orientations (25°, 35°, 45°, 55°, 65°) served as conditioned stimuli (CS) with only one (CS+) paired with the auditory aversive US. Both CS and US were luminance or amplitude modulated, respectively, in a theta (4 Hz) or delta (1.7 Hz) frequency. In both frequencies, CS-US pairings were presented either in-phase (0° phase lag) or out-of-phase (90°, 180°, 270°), resulting in four independent groups (each group N = 40). Phase synchronization augmented the discrimination of CSs in CS-US contingency knowledge but did not affect valence and arousal ratings. Interestingly, this effect occurred independent of frequency. In sum, the current study proves the ability to successfully conduct complex generalization fear conditioning in an online setting. Based on this prerequisite, our data supports a causal role of phase synchronization in the declarative CS-US associations for low frequencies rather than in the specific theta-frequency band.eng
dc.relationhttps://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0281644ger
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 International*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/*
dc.subjectFear conditioningeng
dc.subjectMemoryeng
dc.subjectHuman learningeng
dc.subjectLearningeng
dc.subjectAnalysis of varianceeng
dc.subjectFeareng
dc.subjectMexican peopleeng
dc.subjectVisioneng
dc.subject.ddc150 - Psychologieger
dc.titleEffects of phase synchronization and frequency specificity in the encoding of conditioned fear–a web-based fear conditioning studyeng
dc.typeEinzelbeitrag in einer wissenschaftlichen Zeitschrift [Article]ger
orcid.creatorhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-2396-1811-
orcid.creatorhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-3760-5292-
orcid.creatorhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-8420-6481-
dc.identifier.doi10.1371/journal.pone.0281644-
Enthalten in den Sammlungen:FB08 - Hochschulschriften
Open-Access-Publikationsfonds

Dateien zu dieser Ressource:
Datei Beschreibung GrößeFormat 
Plog_etal_journal.pone.0281644_2023.pdfArticle1,89 MBAdobe PDF
Plog_etal_journal.pone.0281644_2023.pdf
Miniaturbild
Öffnen/Anzeigen


Diese Ressource wurde unter folgender Copyright-Bestimmung veröffentlicht: Lizenz von Creative Commons Creative Commons