Moral Judgements on the Actions of Self-Driving Cars and Human Drivers in Dilemma Situations From Different Perspectives

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:gbv:700-202004202948
Open Access logo originally created by the Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Title: Moral Judgements on the Actions of Self-Driving Cars and Human Drivers in Dilemma Situations From Different Perspectives
Authors: Kallioinen, Noa
Pershina, Maria
Zeiser, Jannik
Nezami, Farbod Nosrat
Pipa, Gordon
Stephan, Achim
K├Ânig, Peter
ORCID of the author: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3654-5267
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3416-2652
Abstract: Self-driving cars have the potential to greatly improve public safety. However, their introduction onto public roads must overcome both ethical and technical challenges. To further understand the ethical issues of introducing self-driving cars, we conducted two moral judgement studies investigating potential differences in the moral norms applied to human drivers and self-driving cars. In the experiments, participants made judgements on a series of dilemma situations involving human drivers or self-driving cars. We manipulated which perspective situations were presented from in order to ascertain the effect of perspective on moral judgements. Two main findings were apparent from the results of the experiments. First, human drivers and self-driving cars were largely judged similarly. However, there was a stronger tendency to prefer self-driving cars to act in ways to minimize harm, compared to human drivers. Second, there was an indication that perspective influences judgements in some situations. Specifically, when considering situations from the perspective of a pedestrian, people preferred actions that would endanger car occupants instead of themselves. However, they did not show such a self-preservation tendency when the alternative was to endanger other pedestrians to save themselves. This effect was more prevalent for judgements on human drivers than self-driving cars. Overall, the results extend and agree with previous research, again contradicting existing ethical guidelines for self-driving car decision making and highlighting the difficulties with adapting public opinion to decision making algorithms.
Citations: Frontiers in Psychologie, 10:2415., DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02415
URL: https://repositorium.ub.uni-osnabrueck.de/handle/urn:nbn:de:gbv:700-202004202948
Subject Keywords: self-driving cars; moral judgement; ethics; virtual reality; moral dilemmas; autonomous vehicles; artificial intelligence ethics
Issue Date: 1-Nov-2019
License name: Attribution 4.0 International
License url: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Type of publication: Einzelbeitrag in einer wissenschaftlichen Zeitschrift [article]
Appears in Collections:FB08 - Hochschulschriften
Open-Access-Publikationsfonds

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Frontiers_10_2415_Kallioinen.pdf2,81 MBAdobe PDF
Frontiers_10_2415_Kallioinen.pdf
Thumbnail
View/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons