Friends or foes? How activists and non-activists perceive and evaluate each other

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:gbv:700-202105144617
Open Access logo originally created by the Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Title: Friends or foes? How activists and non-activists perceive and evaluate each other
Authors: Kutlaca, Maja
van Zomeren, Martijn
Epstude, Kai
ORCID of the author: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9817-3847
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0748-8104
Abstract: Little is known about how activists and non-activists perceive and evaluate each other. This is important because activists often depend on societal support to achieve their goals. We examined these perceptions and evaluations in three field experiments set in different contexts, i.e., student protests in the Netherlands 2014/2015 (Study 1, activist sample N = 190; Study 2, non-activist sample N = 145), and environmental protests in Paris in 2015 (Study 3, activist sample N = 112). Through a scenario method, we manipulated the motivations expressed for (in)action by a member of the other group (i.e., an activist or non-activist) and measured individuals’ perceptions and evaluations. Findings showed that activists perceived a non-activist as selfish and felt personally distant to them, especially when a non-activist dismissed moral obligation for action (Study 1 and 3). By contrast, non-activists had a rather positive view of activists, especially in response to an activist communicating collective concerns for action (Study 2). Study 4 (N = 103) further supported this pattern of findings by showing that activists perceived larger intergroup differences than non-activists. We conclude that mutual perceptions and evaluations of activists and non-activists are asymmetrical, which may have (negative) consequences for mobilization for social change.
Citations: Kutlaca M, van Zomeren M, Epstude K (2020) Friends or foes? How activists and non-activists perceive and evaluate each other. PLoS ONE 15(4): e0230918.
URL: https://repositorium.ub.uni-osnabrueck.de/handle/urn:nbn:de:gbv:700-202105144617
Subject Keywords: Moral philosophy; Social movements; Psychological attitudes; Sociology of knowledge; Nuclear weapons; Social communication; Motivation; Personality
Issue Date: 7-Apr-2020
License name: Attribution 4.0 International
License url: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Type of publication: Einzelbeitrag in einer wissenschaftlichen Zeitschrift [article]
Appears in Collections:FB08 - Hochschulschriften
Open-Access-Publikationsfonds

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
pone_Kutlaca_vanZomeren_Epstude_2020.pdf509,22 kBAdobe PDF
pone_Kutlaca_vanZomeren_Epstude_2020.pdf
Thumbnail
View/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons